🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Trend

Across Europe, a rising chorus of states are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our kids' youth". The policy is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "an measures in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to approve a proposal lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a symbolic resolution demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is given. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A strong age restriction is a useful first step," stated the European lawmaker supporting the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the government has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Last year, support gathered behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to further research the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization founded by the family of a young person who died after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are safe and fit for minors," commented a influential peer.

The US: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily unfolding at the regional level amid federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further time requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws demanding guardian approval for minors to open social media profiles.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from some figures to follow the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Beyond the West, further nations are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international organizations strike a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide conversation evolves, the steps of this nation and several other countries indicate that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.